Working Group on Guidance concerning Smallholder Farmers in relation to private and non-commercial use (WG-SHF/6)
Sixth meeting
October 23, 2024 (Geneva, Switzerland)
Meetings by Topic 
Working Group on Guidance concerning Smallholder Farmers in relation to private and non-commercial use
WG-SHF/5 >> WG-SHF/6
Meeting Documents
| Code | Title(s) | File(s) |
|---|---|---|
| WG-SHF/6/1 | Draft Agenda |  EN FR ES  EN FR ES |
| WG-SHF/6/2 | Compilation of responses to the questions concerning the exception “acts done privately and for non commercial purposes” | EN FR ES EN FR ES |
| WG-SHF/6/2 ANNEX | Compilation of responses to the questions concerning the exception “acts done privately and for non commercial purposes” received in reply to Circular E-24/047of April 22, 2024 |  EN |
| WG-SHF/6/3 | Summary of the interventions by members of the WG-SHF during the fifth meeting on the possible organization of a seminar | EN FR ES EN FR ES |
Comments
| Code | Title(s) | File(s) |
|---|---|---|
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/1 | Comments from Albania | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/2 | Comments from Argentina | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/3 | Comments from Australia | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/4 | Comments from Austria | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/5 | Comments from Azerbaijan | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/6 | Comments from Belarus | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/7 | Comments from Belgium | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/8 | Comments from Brazil | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/9 | Comments from Canada | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/10 | Comments from Chile | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/11 | Comments from China | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/12 | Comments from Estonia | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/13 | Comments from European Union | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/14 | Comments from Georgia | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/15 | Comments from Hungary | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/16 | Comments from Israel | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/17 | Comments from Japan | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/18 | Comments from the Republic of Korea | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/19 | Comments from Latvia | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/20 | Comments from Lithuania | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/21 | Comments from Mexico | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/22 | Comments from the Republic of Moldova | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/23 | Comments from the Kingdom of the Netherlands | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/24 | Comments from Norway | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/25 | Comments from Panama | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/26 | Comments from Poland | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/27 | Comments from Portugal | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/28 | Comments from Romania | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/29 | Comments from the Republic of Serbia | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/30 | Comments from Slovakia | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/31 | Comments from South Africa | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/32 | Comments from Spain | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/33 | Comments from Sweden | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/34 | Comments from Trinidad and Tobago | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/35 | Comments from the United Kingdom | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/36 | Comments from the United States of America | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/37 | Comments from Uruguay | EN |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/38 | Comments from Viet Nam | EN |
