Working Group on Guidance concerning Smallholder Farmers in relation to private and non-commercial use (WG-SHF/6)
Sixth meeting
October 23, 2024 (Geneva, Switzerland)
Meetings by Topic
Working Group on Guidance concerning Smallholder Farmers in relation to private and non-commercial use
WG-SHF/5 >> WG-SHF/6
Meeting Documents
| Code | Title(s) | File(s) |
|---|---|---|
| WG-SHF/6/1 | Draft Agenda | |
| WG-SHF/6/2 | Compilation of responses to the questions concerning the exception “acts done privately and for non commercial purposes” | |
| WG-SHF/6/2 ANNEX | Compilation of responses to the questions concerning the exception “acts done privately and for non commercial purposes” received in reply to Circular E-24/047of April 22, 2024 | |
| WG-SHF/6/3 | Summary of the interventions by members of the WG-SHF during the fifth meeting on the possible organization of a seminar | |
| WG-SHF/6/4 | Report | |
| WG-SHF/6/INF/1 REV. | Revised list of persons registered in advance for the session |
Comments
| Code | Title(s) | File(s) |
|---|---|---|
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/1 | Comments from Albania | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/2 | Comments from Argentina | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/3 | Comments from Australia | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/4 | Comments from Austria | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/5 | Comments from Azerbaijan | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/6 | Comments from Belarus | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/7 | Comments from Belgium | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/8 | Comments from Brazil | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/9 | Comments from Canada | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/10 | Comments from Chile | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/11 | Comments from China | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/12 | Comments from Estonia | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/13 | Comments from European Union | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/14 | Comments from Georgia | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/15 | Comments from Hungary | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/16 | Comments from Israel | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/17 | Comments from Japan | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/18 | Comments from the Republic of Korea | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/19 | Comments from Latvia | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/20 | Comments from Lithuania | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/21 | Comments from Mexico | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/22 | Comments from the Republic of Moldova | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/23 | Comments from the Kingdom of the Netherlands | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/24 | Comments from Norway | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/25 | Comments from Panama | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/26 | Comments from Poland | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/27 | Comments from Portugal | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/28 | Comments from Romania | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/29 | Comments from the Republic of Serbia | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/30 | Comments from Slovakia | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/31 | Comments from South Africa | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/32 | Comments from Spain | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/33 | Comments from Sweden | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/34 | Comments from Trinidad and Tobago | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/35 | Comments from the United Kingdom | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/36 | Comments from the United States of America | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/37 | Comments from Uruguay | |
| WG-SHF/6/2/COMMENTS/38 | Comments from Viet Nam |